2020
Contribution to book  Open Access

Architectural heritage at risk: the case of the Magnano hamlet (Piedmont, Italy)

Fratini F, Mattone M, Rescic S

re-use  preservation  Preservation  identity  Risk  risk  Architectural heritage  Compatibility  Identity  architectural heritage  compatibility  Re-use 

The architecture is the result of the men's work, whose actions do not end with its construction, but are inevitably destined to follow one another over time, responding to the various natural and/or anthropic solicitations to which it is subjected. The progressive change in social and economic needs, together with the lack of recognition of the value of the inherited architectural heritage, causes an increasing pressure both on individual historic buildings and on ancient sites. Considered as obsolete and incapable of responding to current performance and functional requirements, the architectural heritage is often abandoned or subjected to radical transformations, causing the irremediable loss of valuable cultural resources. The examination of the current state of conservation of the Magnano hamlet is interesting for the purposes of "Risk in architectural heritage". It is a defensive settlement built at the beginning of the XIIIth century and characterized by the presence of building cells lying on the crest of a hill and surrounded by walls. Some of these cells are today totally abandoned and, therefore, affected by decay phenomena due to the aggressive action exerted by environmental agents; others have undergone interventions that, although aimed at allowing their possible re-use, have led to the partial or total loss of the identity features of this heritage. This paper intends to focus on the analysis of the interventions carried out, examining the methodologies adopted and some critical issues in the belief that only by searching for compatible solutions in terms of materials, structures and functionality, it is possible to become promoters of an effective conservation of the architectural heritage.


Acar Bilgin E., 2019: Rural Architectural Characteristics and Conservation Issues of Alaaddinbey Village in Bursa (Turkey), D. Hawkes et al. (eds.), Conservation of Architectural Heritage, Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation, © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio, D. Lgs. 22 gennaio 2004, n. 42, art. 30 Dipasquale L., Rovero L., Fratini F. 2016: Ancient stone masonry constructions”, in Edited by Kent A. Harries and Bhavna Sharma “Nonconventional and Vernacular Construction Materials: characterisation, properties and applications”, Elsevier-Woodhead Publishing, 301-332 Dezzi Bardeschi, M., 2002: “Victor Hugo alla prima crociata contro i “restauri””, Ananke, 33, pp. 6-15.
Ermentini, M. 2019: Il segreto della carezza ovvero ideario di restauro timido. Nardini Editore, Firenze.
Council of Europe. 2005: Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faroconvention) Della Torre, S. 2019: “A coevolutionary approach to the re-use of built cultural heritage”, atti del 35° Convegno di studi su Scienza e Beni Culturali: “Il patrimonio culturale in mutamento: le sfide del riuso”, Bressanone 1-5 luglio 2019, pp. 25-34.
Fratini F., Mattone M., Rescic R. 2019: Re-use of a medieval tower between conservation and transformation”, atti del 35° Convegno di studi su Scienza e Beni Culturali: “Il patrimonio culturale in mutamento: le sfide del riuso”, Bressanone 1-5 luglio 2019, pp. 411-420.
Musso S.F. and Franco G. 2015: Guidelines for sustainable rehabilitation of the rural architecture, in “Vernacular architecture: toward a sustainable future”, Mileto, VegaS, Garcia Soriano & Cristini (Eds), Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 531-536 Pagliuca, A. 2017: Compatibilità, in Dezzi Bardeschi, C.: Abbeceddario minimo. Cento voci per il restauro. Altralinea, Firenze.
Philokyprou M. 2018. Conservation of Vernacular Dwellings.
Matters of Authenticity and Sustainability. In: Koui M., Zezza F., Kouis D. (eds) 10th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin.
MONUBASIN 2017. Springer, Cham Picone, R., 2004: Conservazione e accessibilità. Il superamento delle barriere architettoniche negli edifici e nei siti storici. Arte Tipografica editrice, Napoli.
Prajnawrdhi T.A. 2020. Transformation Versus Preservation of Vernacular Architecture in Bali: A Lesson from Bali Aga Villages. In: Suartika G., Nichols J. (eds) Reframing the Vernacular: Politics, Semiotics, and Representation. Springer, Cham Settia, A., 1976: “Fortificazioni collettive nei villaggi medievali dell'alta Italia: ricetti, villeforti, recinti, “Bollettino bibliografico storico subalpino”, XXIV, pp. 527-617.
Sulfaro, N. 2018: L'architettura come opera aperta. Il tema dell'uso nel progetto di conservazione, ArcHistoR EXTRA 2.
Vassallo, E., 2007: Architettura e architetture, in Ferlenga, A., Vassallo, E., Schellino, F. (a cura di): Antico e Nuovo.
Architettura e Architetture, Atti del Convegno (Venezia 31 marzo-3 aprile 2004). Il, Poligrafo, Venezia, p. 23.
Vegas F., Mileto C., 2015: 0 km conservation, “Vernacular architecture: toward a sustainable future”, Mileto, VegaS, Garcia Soriano & Cristini (Eds), Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp.737-740 Vegas, F., Mileto, C., 2007: Renovar conservando. Manual para la restauracion de la arquitectura rural del Rincón de Ademuz.
Viglino Davico, M., 1978: I ricetti, difese collettive per gli uomini del contado nel Piemonte medioevale. Edialbra, Torino, pp. 154-161.

Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@inbook{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:437022,
	title = {Architectural heritage at risk: the case of the Magnano hamlet (Piedmont, Italy)},
	author = {Fratini F and Mattone M and Rescic S},
	doi = {10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-1-2020-841-2020},
	year = {2020}
}